MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W174899649 · doi:10.1093/sleep/31.11.1492

Unraveling the Mechanisms of REM Sleep Atonia

2008· letter· en· W174899649 on OpenAlexafffund
Patricia L. Brooks, John Peever

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2008
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceNon-rapid eye movement sleepGlycine receptorPsychologyMuscle toneWakefulnessEye movementElectroencephalographyBiologyGlycine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WE THANK THE EDITORS1 FOR THIS FORUM AND THE COMMENTATORS2–6 FOR THEIR DISCUSSION OF OUR WORK.7 WE AGREE WITH THE COMMENTATORS that determining mechanisms of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep motor atonia is of major scientific importance and clinical relevance. The concept that REM atonia is under the control of one physiological mechanism and one neurotransmitter pathway has seduced many of us. The undoubted appeal of the current theory—that glycinergic inhibition of motoneurons is the only mechanism mediating REM atonia—is its inherent simplicity. However, the fact that several laboratories now provide evidence indicating that glycinergic inhibition plays only a minimal role in mediating REM atonia7–9 and that other neurotransmitter pathways contribute to motor suppression in REM sleep10–13 indicates that we need to reevaluate mechanisms of REM atonia. If glycinergic inhibition is indeed the dominating force driving motor inhibition during REM sleep, then why does blockade of glycine receptors at the trigeminal motor pool not prevent REM atonia in masseter muscles?7 Our work demonstrates that antagonism of glycine and GABAA receptors at the trigeminal motor pool causes a profound increase in masseter muscle tone during both wakefulness and non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep; however, this same intervention does not prevent or even reverse REM atonia, despite the fact that it potently provokes muscle-twitch activity in REM sleep (Figure 1). In fact, REM atonia persists even when glycine and GABAA receptors are blocked and potent glutamatergic agonists are simultaneously applied to the trigeminal motor pool. We interpret these findings to indicate that (1) glycinergic- and GABAA-mediated inhibition plays a minimal role in triggering REM atonia; (2) inhibition primarily functions to suppress muscle twitches during REM sleep; and, (3) a powerful, yet unidentified, inhibitory mechanism or mechanisms override excitation during REM sleep. Some commentators offer alternative possibilities for our experimental observations; we respond to these discussion points below. Figure 1 Blockade of glycine and GABAA receptors at the trigeminal motor pool does not prevent masseter muscle atonia during REM sleep. A. Typical EMG and EEG traces illustrating that strychnine/bicuculline perfusion into the left trigeminal motor pool increases ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207