Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays intercultural communication is the subject of great topical interest in foreign languages circles. The close relationship between language and culture determines the connotation of foreign language teaching. We should realize that teaching foreign language means not only imparting of language knowledge but also spreading cultural knowledge and cultivating of students’intercultural communication ability. This between language and culture,and some problems existing in foreign language teaching and discusses the necessity and importance of cultivating of students’ intercultural communication ability. Keywords: culture, language, foreign language teaching, intercultural communication Resume La communication transculturelle est aujourd’hui un sujet chaud dans le monde des langues etrangeres. La relation inseparable entre la langue et la culture decide que l’enseignement des langues etrangeres ne comprend pas seulement la transmission des connaissances de la langue, mais aussi celle de la culture et la formation des capacites des etudiants dans la communication transculturelle. Cet essai traite, a travers l’analyse de la connotation de la communication transculturelle, des relations entre la langue et la culture et des problemes existants dans l’enseignement des langes etrangeres, la necessite et la signification de former les capacites de la communication transculturelle dans l’enseignement des langues etrangeres. Mots-cles: culture, langue, enseignement des langues etrangeres, communication transculturelle 摘 要 跨文化交際是當今外語界的一個熱門話題。語言和文化密不可分的關係決定了外語教學不僅是語言知識的傳授，而且更應包括文化知識的傳播和對學生跨文化交際能力的培養。本文通過分析跨文化交際的內涵, 語言與文化的關係 ,外語教學中存在的一些問題，探討新時代外語教學中培養跨文化交際能力的必然性和重要意義。 關鍵詞：文化；語言；外語教學；跨文化交際
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".