Geographic and temporal distribution of Agriotes obscurus and A. lineatus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in British Columbia and Washington as determined by pheromone trap surveys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Initial and peak catch of male Agriotes obscurus (L.) in pheromone traps in the lower Fraser Valley of BC occurred 15.6 and 18.7 days, respectively, before A. lineatus (L.). Both A. obscurus and A. lineatus were taken in pheromone traps from each of 77 fields monitored throughout the lower Fraser Valley during 2000 and 2001, expanding the known ranges of both species. No specimens of either species were taken in pheromone traps set at 56 sites distributed throughout the Okanagan, Similkameen and Nichola Valleys in 2000, but one specimen of A. lineatus was found in a private collection that had been captured near Merritt BC. This is the first record of A. lineatus in BC outside of the lower Fraser Valley. Of nine counties surveyed in Washington State in 2000, A. obscurus was taken in traps at several sites in Whatcom county, especially along the Canada/US border, and A. lineatus was taken at several sites in Whatcom, Snohomish and Pierce counties. Key words: wireworms; Elateridae; Agriotes lineatus; Agriotes obscurus; pheromone traps
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".