MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gender Differences on the Identity Status of the Malaysian Preparatory Students

2010· article· en· W1750873157 on OpenAlex
Farhana Wan Yunus, Azlan Ahmad Kamal, Kamaruzaman Jusoff, Azyyati Zakaria

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)HumanitiesPsychologyLikert scaleSocial psychologySociologyDevelopmental psychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of students who wishes to change their major is increasing everyday. There are quite a number of students who are still unsure about their future plans even though they have enrolled in a university program. A reason may be that the students are still in conflict about their own identity. Students who are doing their preparatory program should already develop their own identity, which is identity achievement. A survey aimed to study gender differences on the identity status among the preparatory students was conducted. A questionnaire regarding the students’ identity status was used to collect the data. A Likert scale with a four point system was used to measure responses on the questionnaire which consisted of the students’ view of their own choice of major, friendship, recreational activities, dating style and political believes. The findings of this study are important to the lecturers teaching the preparatory programs so that they are aware of their students’ sense of identity as well as help them reach identity achievement.Keywords: Achievement; adolescent; diffusion; foreclosure; identity status; moratorium Resume:  Le nombre d'etudiants qui souhaitent changer leur specialite augmente tous les jours. Il y a un certain nombre d'eleves qui n'ont toujours pas de plans sur leur future, meme s'ils se sont inscrits dans un programme universitaire. Sans doute une raison est que les etudiants sont toujours en conflit avec leur propre identite. Les etudiants qui font leur programme preparatoire devraient deja developper leur propre identite. Une enquete visant a etudier les differences entre les sexes sur le statut d'identite parmi les eleves dans les programmes preparatoires a ete effectuee. Un questionnaire concernant l'etat d'identite des etudiants a ete utilise pour collecter les donnees. Une echelle de Likert a ete utilisee pour mesurer les reponses dans le questionnaire, qui demande les avis des etudiants sur leur choix de la specialite, de l'amitie, des activites recreatives, du style de dating et des preferences politiques. Les resultats de cette etude sont importantes pour les enseignants des programmes preparatoires afin qu'ils soient au courant de la perception des eleves sur leur identite. Ainsi ils peuvent les aider a construire leur identite.Mots-cles: realisation; adolescent; diffusion, forclusion; statut d'identite; moratoire

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it