Financing Mode of American Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and the Enlightenment to Our Country
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because of the characteristic of small and medium-sized enterprises such as small scale of assets, low transparency message and heavy uncertainty of management, the financing mode of small and medium-sized enterprises of various countries is the same basically. This paper reflect the characteristic of the financing mode of small and medium-sized enterprises of our country indirectly through studying the financing mode and characteristics of American small and medium-sized enterprises, expecting to enlighten alleviating the difficulty of financing of small and medium-sized enterprises of our country . Key words: Financing mode, Characteristic, Enlightenment Resume : La modele de fusion des petites et moyennes entreprises dans tous les pays existe des points communs , en raison de ses quelques caracteristiques suivantes : les capitaux de petite envergure , la transparence insuffisante des informations et l’instabilite de gestion . A travers la recherche sur la modele de fusion des petites et moyennes entreprises aux etats-unis , ce texte reflete de facon indirecte les traits de modele de fusion des petites et moyennes entreprises en Chine dans l’espoir de donner l’inspiration a l’attenuation des difficultes de la fusion des petites et moyennes entreprises de notre pays . Mots-cles: modele de diffusion, traits , inspiration 摘要:由於中小企業具有資產規模小,資訊透明度低,經營不確定性大等特徵,各國中小企業融資模式存在一定的共同之處。本文通過研究美國中小企業融資模式及其特徵,間接反映了我國中小企業融資模式的特點,期望對緩解我國中小企業融資困難有所啟示。 關鍵詞:融資模式;特徵;啟示
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".