The Radial Artery in Reoperative Coronary Bypass Surgery:. A 5-Year Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Failure of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) is a significant cause for coronary reoperation (redo CABG). The radial artery (RA) because of its availability, and versatility is well suited to use (together with internal thoracic arteries (ITA) in redo CABG, especially to replace failed SVG. We evaluated our experience where the RA was a major conduit in redo CABG over the past 5 years. METHODS: From July 1996 to June 2002, 590 consecutive patients underwent redo CABG where one or both RA(s) were used, together with LITA or RITA. The mean age was 67.3 years, 82% were male, and 19% diabetic, 419 (71%) had Class III or IV angina, 135 (23%) had left main stenosis, and 210 (36%) had an LVEF < 0.50. There were a total of 877 RA conduits (303 single, 287 bilateral), 518 new LITA or RITA. A mean of 2.8 new distal anastomoses constructed 92% (2.6 per patient)of the arterial grafts. Follow-up was at 1 month, 3 months, and then yearly. The results were compared with 6466 primary CABG performed in the same time frame, and with a prior cohort of 741 consecutive patients having redo CABG without an RA in which identical operative techniques had otherwise been used. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 3.9% (23 patients). Morbidity was low. Perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 16 (2.7%) patients, stroke in 10 (1.7%), sternal infection in 10 (1.7%), donor site infection in 2 (0.3%), and IABP use in 23 patients (3.9%)-including 10 preoperatively. The results were better when compared to a prior cohort of 741 patients with redo CABG (1991 to 1996) without use of the RA. The results were inferior to that of the contemporary primary CABG. Operative mortality was 3.9% versus 0.9%, p = 0.002, myocardial infarction 2.7% versus 0.8%, p = 0.03. CONCLUSION: The use of the RA (together with ITA) in redo CABG achieved total arterial revascularization in 92% of cases and is associated with excellent results, at least equal to or superior to those achieved previously.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".