Pediatric ossiculoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the medium-term efficacy of total ossicular reconstruction with a titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) in children. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: A consecutive series of children receiving an adjustable-length titanium TORP was identified from a prospective surgical and audiological database. Audiometric testing was obtained preoperatively, 2 months postoperatively, and subsequently at 6- to 12-month intervals. Four-frequency pure-tone averages (PTA) were determined for air conduction (AC) and bone conduction thresholds, as well as air-bone gap (ABG). Pre- and postoperative measures were compared to determine degree of improvement. The proportion with successful outcome (defined as ≤ 30 dB hearing level [HL] AC) was determined over time with Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-five TORPs were inserted in 71 children aged 7 to 18 years, with a median follow-up of 2.7 years (0.6-5.5 years). The mean postoperative PTA AC threshold and ABG at 1 year were 35 dB HL and 29 dB, respectively, with ABG closure of 14 dB. The maximum gain in AC was 40 dB, achieved in eight (11%) cases. Successful outcome was seen in 50% of children at first follow-up. Over the following 1 to 3 years, hearing levels deteriorated to AC > 30 dB HL in an additional 10% of patients. Four patients had revision surgery, one for prosthesis extrusion and three for a lack of improvement in hearing. CONCLUSIONS: Titanium TORPs offer children an effective method of ossicular reconstruction, with infrequent extrusion at least in the short term. The hearing improvement achieved in the early postoperative period appears to be maintained over the first year but may not be sustained over longer time periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".