Fortalecer la identidad y transmitir un legado: la propuesta del Algonquin Provincial Park Ontario, Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El desarrollo de la IP esta intimamente ligado a los parques norteamericanos Canada cuenta con una dilatada trayectoria en el campo de la interpretacion, marcada por dos rasgos: en primer lugar, la vision del patrimonio como instrumento esencial para reforzar la conciencia nacional y para fortalecer la identidad canadiens. Mediante la interpretacion se enfatizan aquellos rasgos que configuran y singularizan la nacion, como el esfuerzo de las generaciones pasadas por construir y hacer avanzar el pa is, y se ahonda en las raices nacionalistas al rememorar los principales acontecimientos que fraguaron la historia de la nacion. En segundo lugar, la valoracion del patrimonio como conjunto de bienes a legar para que puedan ser disfrutados por las generaciones futuras. Este interes por preservar y hacer comprensible el patrimonio enraiza, por una parte, con un sentimiento de nostalgia hacia el pasado ante una sociedad en transformacion, que esta abandonando la vida tradicional, rural y campesina y sus rasgos culturales tradicionales para dar paso a formas de vida mas tecnologicas y mecanizadas, fruto de la actual sociedad postindustrial y global. Y, por otra parte, da respuesta a una importante demanda social, disfrutar del patrimonio en los momentos de ocio y tiempo libre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".