The effect of gap-marker spectrum on gap-evoked auditory response from the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of guinea pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study is to verify the effects of gap marker spectrum on gap-evoked auditory responses. The gap-evoked potentials were recorded using electrodes implanted in the inferior colliculus (IC) and auditory cortex (AC) of guinea pigs. The gap markers were noise bursts in four frequency bands (500-8,000 Hz, 500-16,000 Hz, 500-32,000 Hz, and 16,000-32,000 Hz), and were tested at three sound levels. The onset response to the post-gap marker was measured to obtain the gap response threshold, and to establish input-output functions for latency and amplitude. Similar to previous behavioural studies, it was found that the gap-response threshold decreased with increasing marker bandwidth. This change was more significant at the cortical level in which the averaged gap-threshold decreased by approximately 2 ms with the bandwidth change. However, the gap threshold in the high frequency region (16,000-32,000 Hz) was comparable to that of the low frequency region (500-16,000 Hz). These results suggest that the total bandwidth of all auditory channels that are recruited determine the temporal resolution measured in gap-evoked potentials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".