Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tomando como punto departida el trabajo de Peter Rudnytsky sobre la presencia ubicua de la historia de Edipo en la literatura y filosof?a alemanas durante los dos ?ltimos siglos, en este art?culo comentamos una presencia semejante en la literatura rom?ntica en Espa?a y analizamos una obra que ha recibido poca atenci?n cr?tica: el drama Alfredo, de Joaqu?n Francisco Pacheco. Mediante un acercamiento psico anal?tico y feminista, investigamos tres temas constantes y entrelazados del teatro rom?ntico. Adem?s del conflicto ed?pico, se estudia el tema del sino, aspecto que se vincula en el drama de Pacheco con la melancol?a, de la cual ya padece el protagonista cuando se levanta el tel?n. Gracias a esta melancol?a, Alfredo forja su identidad otro tema representativo del teatro de este per?odo -pero a consecuencia de la incorporaci?n de la imagen de su padre supuestamente muerto, su identidad le conduce a enamorarse de su madrastra y a imponer su voluntad sobre los dem?s, llevando a cabo una rebeli?n que desemboca en el triunfo del padre y el suicidio del hijo. As? se cumple el sino tr?gico del h?roe rom?ntico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".