Cysteine-String Protein Increases the Calcium Sensitivity of Neurotransmitter Exocytosis in <i>Drosophila</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that the vesicular cysteine-string protein (CSP) may modulate presynaptic Ca(2+) channel activity in fast neurotransmitter release. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the dynamics of presynaptic Ca(2+) ion influx with the Ca(2+) indicator fluo-4 AM at csp mutant neuromuscular junctions of Drosophila. From 24 to 30 degrees C, stimulus-evoked, relative presynaptic Ca(2+) signals were increasingly larger in csp mutant boutons than in controls. Above 30 degrees C, Ca(2+) signals declined and were similar to controls at 34 degrees C. A prolonged decay of Ca(2+) signals in mutant boutons at high temperatures indicated abnormally slow Ca(2+) clearance. Cytosolic Ca(2+) at rest was determined with the ratiometric Ca(2+) indicator fura-2 AM and was similar in mutant and control boutons at 24 degrees C but higher in mutant boutons at 34 degrees C. Despite larger Ca(2+) signals in mutant boutons, evoked neurotransmitter release was always reduced in csp mutants and exhibited pronounced facilitation. Thus, a lack of Ca(2+) entry cannot explain the reduction of neurotransmitter release in csp mutants. At all temperatures tested, raising extracellular Ca(2+) increased transmitter release elicited by single stimuli in csp mutants. Collectively, these data suggest multiple functions for CSP at synaptic terminals. Increased Ca(2+) signals coupled with reduced release suggest a direct function of CSP in exocytosis downstream from Ca(2+) entry. Because the reduction of evoked release in csp mutants is counteracted by increased Ca(2+) levels, we suggest that CSP primarily increases the Ca(2+) sensitivity of the exocytotic machinery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".