MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W17612602 · doi:10.1139/w07-005

Tracking key marketing health parameters within smaller enterprises

2003· article· en· W17612602 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Reynolds, Geoffrey A. Lancaster

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicForecasting Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarketingMarketing researchKey (lock)Context (archaeology)Marketing strategyProcess (computing)Process managementControl (management)Business marketingSet (abstract data type)Scheme (mathematics)Tracking (education)Reliability (semiconductor)BusinessComputer securityArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper interfaces concepts and techniques from process control and marketing control in order to effectively monitor the marketing ‘health’ of small firms. In essence the authors attempt to apply short term time series forecasting techniques in addition to a tracking signal device to monitor key marketing parameters within small firms on a continuous or ‘on-going’ basis. The techniques used are well established although they are more usually found employed in the areas of process control and inventory control. The application of such a scheme within a small business marketing context is considered novel and somewhat experimental. The scheme discussed in this working paper is very much in the exploratory stage and much more work needs to be done to test the reliability and validity of the scheme to effectively track key marketing parameters within smaller enterprises in a variety of ‘real world’ situations and under different market conditions. If the scheme proves to have operational and practical usefulness as a monitoring device then it should be of interest to all people involved with monitoring or advising a large number of small enterprises or business units within a larger organisation. Because the research is on-going this paper presents an interim set of results and conclusions and is therefore very much a ‘working paper’ hence the appropriateness of the paper appearing in this London Metropolitan University Working Paper Series. This paper is linked to other working papers concerned with the marketing of smaller enterprises appearing in the University’s working paper series by the same authors, for example see also Reynolds PL, Day, J and Lancaster, GA, (June 2001, papers (a) and (b)). A further, updated version of this paper is likely to appear in this series in the near future as the results from future work is added to the paper and consolidated within the existing conceptual scheme. This paper is part of an on going programme of research conducted by the authors and others into the marketing appropriate for small firms in particular and small and medium sized firms (SME’s) in general. Although the working papers presented by the authors in the series so far are on different aspects of marketing they are thematic in that they are all concerned with smaller firms and on the interface between small firms, marketing and entrepreneurship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207