Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives：The purpose of this study is to assess the changes of quality of life in the treatment of acute onset schizophrenic patients with amisulpride. Also, we investigated how the subjective quality of life is related with patients’ depression, attitude to medication, satisfaction to medication, psychopathology, symptom severity, symptom improvement and functioning of schizophrenia. Methods：54 schizophrenic patients in 6 hospitals were administered amisulpride. Psychiatric status was evaluated by Korean version of 4 th Revision of Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale(SQLS-R4K), Korean version of Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia(K-CDSS), Korean version of Drug Attitude Inventory(KDAI-10), Drug Satisfaction Questionaire(DSQ), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS), Clinical Global Impression scale(CGI) and Global Assessment of Functioning Scale(GAF Scale) at baseline, day1, week2, week4 and week6. Results：Subjective quality of life and depressive symptom were improved significantly after administering amisulpride. Subjective quality of life was related significantly with total score, negative, positive symptom and general psychopathology score in PANSS. Subjective quality of life correlated significantly with drug satisfaction, but not drug attitude, depressive symptoms, CGI-S, CGI-I and GAF score. Conclusions：This study suggests that the subjective quality of life of schizophrenic patients, who had treated with amisulpride, is influenced significantly. Active management for positive, negative symptoms and drug side effect is recommended to improve patients’ quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".