MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1763804216 · doi:10.1198/0003130031072

Statistics and Ethics

2003· article· en· W1763804216 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen B. Vardeman, Max D. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Statistician · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistics Education and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsCollege of the North Atlantic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvice (programming)StatisticsWork (physics)SociologyPsychologyComputer scienceMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We write to young statisticians about the nature of statistics and their responsibilities as members ofthe statistical profession. We observe that the practice of the discipline is inherently moral and that this fact has serious implications for their work. In light of this, we offer some advice about how they should resolve to think and act.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.114
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.177
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1140.177
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.060
Scholarly communication0.0160.009
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0160.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American StatisticianSame topicStatistics Education and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207