MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Border thinking and feminist solidarity in the fourth world

2011· article· en· W1765041298 on OpenAlex
Martha Nandorfy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTropelías/Tropelías · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerformative utteranceSolidarityMulticulturalismHumanitiesSociologyGender studiesCartographyArt historyPolitical scienceArtAestheticsLawGeographyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From a governmental perspective, multiculturalism tends to be reduced to a hollow celebration of superficial differences, a strategic policy to control and contain forms of difference that actually require a process of community awareness to open towards the other, rather than merely tolerate it. This essay examines the writing of several Mexican-Americans and Chicano authors through the approach of their thought border. Gloria Anzaldúa’s and Cherrie Moraga’s poems illuminate perspectives of such conceptual strength as Chandra Talpade Mohanty’s most theoretical and academic discourse. The poets, performative artists and academics I consider in this work build intercultural bridges as solidary and collective response against commercial, military and government powers who speak of erasing borders when it comes to the free flow of money and hand cheap labor, but that want close them to prohibit the free flow of ideas and creative beings who seek a better life. Desde una perspectiva gubernamental, el multiculturalismo tiende a reducirse a una hueca celebración de diferencias superficiales; una política estratégica para controlar y contener las formas de diferencia que en realidad requieren un proceso de conscientización comunitaria para abrirse hacia el otro, en vez de simplemente tolerarlo. Este ensayo examina la escritura de varios autores mexicano-americanos y chicanas/os a través del enfoque de su pensamiento fronterizo. Poemas de Gloria Anzaldúa y Cherríe Moraga iluminan perspectives con tanta fuerza conceptual como el discurso más teórico-académico de Chandra Talpade Mohanty. Tanto los poetas, los artistas performativos y los académicos que considero en este trabajo construyen puentes interculturales como respuesta colectiva y solidaria en contra de los poderes comerciales, militares, y gubernamentales que hablan de borrar las fronteras cuando se trata del libre flujo de dinero y mano de obra barata, pero que las quieren cerrar para prohibir el flujo libre de ideas creativas y seres que buscan una vida mejor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it