MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Research and Application of High Temperature Resistance Plugging Agent and Plugging Technology

2014· article· en· W1766204108 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chunsheng Wang, Sun Yingfan, Zhenzhen Zhang, Meng Shan, Chang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringViscosityMaterials scienceComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For high temperature steam channeling problem of the middle and later of the heavy oil reservoir, using simple variable method to optimize the ratio of the of proportion the plugging agent and Static and dynamic performance are evaluated; combined the experimental data with CMG numerical simulation software to optimize the plugging process parameters. The formula of high temperature resistant gel type plugging agent system: The first working liquid: 1.8%cross-linking agent II+ 6% modified high temperature resistant main agent; The second working liquid: 0.03% coagulant aid+2.2% cross-linking agent I. The gelling viscosity of the plugging agent more than 2 x 106 mPa·s, PH = 6-8 is applied, heat-resistant > 280 ℃, plugging rate > 96.75%; Using the double fluid method and low-pressure low-emission to inject. Optimizing the radius of profile control is 15 m, valid for 7-10 months, it has the obvious effect of increasing oil and controlling water. Key words : Steam flooding; Steam channeling; High temperature; Plugging agent; Profile control; Double fluid method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207