MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Research and Application of High Temperature Resistance Plugging Agent and Plugging Technology

2014· article· en· W1766204108 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chunsheng Wang, Sun Yingfan, Zhenzhen Zhang, Meng Shan, Chang Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringViscosityMaterials scienceComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For high temperature steam channeling problem of the middle and later of the heavy oil reservoir, using simple variable method to optimize the ratio of the of proportion the plugging agent and Static and dynamic performance are evaluated; combined the experimental data with CMG numerical simulation software to optimize the plugging process parameters. The formula of high temperature resistant gel type plugging agent system: The first working liquid: 1.8%cross-linking agent II+ 6% modified high temperature resistant main agent; The second working liquid: 0.03% coagulant aid+2.2% cross-linking agent I. The gelling viscosity of the plugging agent more than 2 x 106 mPa·s, PH = 6-8 is applied, heat-resistant > 280 ℃, plugging rate > 96.75%; Using the double fluid method and low-pressure low-emission to inject. Optimizing the radius of profile control is 15 m, valid for 7-10 months, it has the obvious effect of increasing oil and controlling water. Key words : Steam flooding; Steam channeling; High temperature; Plugging agent; Profile control; Double fluid method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207