MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1766886088 · doi:10.22230/jem.2012v13n1a199

Putting Knowledge to Work: The Fisher Habitat Extension Initiative

2012· article· en· W1766886088 on OpenAlexaff
Pedro Lara Almuedo, Rich D. Weir, Fraser B. Corbould, Larry R. Davis, Eric C. Lofroth, Mark Phinney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecosystems and Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Innovations and Practices
Canadian institutionsLouisiana-Pacific (Canada)BC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtension (predicate logic)Work (physics)HabitatEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEnvironmental planningEcologyComputer scienceEngineeringEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ishers (Martes pennanti) are carnivores of the weasel family that rely on many features of late-successional forests to survive and reproduce. Fishers are considered a species at risk in British Columbia under the Identified Wildlife Management Strategy of the Forest and Range Practices Act 2004 and is also considered a "species of special concern" (blue-listed) by BC's Conservation Data Centre. Under BC's Forest and Range Practices Act 2004, forest licensees are required to maintain key habitat features for fishers within their tenures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Ecosystems and ManagementSame topicAgricultural Innovations and PracticesFrench-language works237,207