Clinical approach to monitoring variability associated with adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD) is a voice disorder characterized by considerable intra- and intersubject variability. Although objective, acoustic measures of voice may provide a metric for ADSD, such measures can be inefficient in documenting such characteristics. This project integrated a simple auditory-perceptual measure termed "laryngeal overpressure" (LO) with measures of acoustic variability. METHODS: Ten adults diagnosed with ADSD were sequentially followed over a period of 3 to 6 months. Standard voice recordings were obtained at each point, and acoustic measures were gathered. Additionally, three experienced listeners then rated LO using a visual analogue scale, and acoustic variability was assessed relative to the measure of LO. RESULTS: Listener ratings of LO did not differ across the three-sentence stimuli and were highly correlated (r = .828 and .909 for naive and experienced listeners, respectively). A strong correlation was identified between the acoustic measure of harmonics to noise ratio and the all-voiced sentence stimuli (r = .710). CONCLUSION: LO appears to provide an easy clinical method of documenting voice change over time in those with ADSD. Although additional methods of voice monitoring may be used, the use of LO may provide the opportunity for a standard and reliable approach to the clinical monitoring of voice variability in those presenting with ADSD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".