MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Experimental Study on Transfer of Cultural Connotation of Vocabulary

2011· article· en· W1769252403 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shujing Wu, Dou Tong-pei

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnotationVocabularyLinguisticsPsychologyVocabulary learningTest (biology)HumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on transfer theory and Kellerman’s psychotypology markedness theory, this study was focused on the transfer of cultural connotation of vocabulary of the Chinese EFL learners. 216 subjects of English and non-English majors from three Chinese universities participated in a series of test in the study. Based on the scores of the test, this study yielded into two important findings. First, whole-group analysis showed that there existed transfer of cultural connotation of vocabulary among the Chinese EFL learners and the cultural awareness of the learners are positively correlative with their language capability. Second, the between-group analysis indicated L2 capability was negatively correlative with the ratio of transfer of cultural connotation of vocabulary. The ratio of transfer of cultural connotation of vocabulary of the high-ability learners was lower than that of the low-ability learners. Furthermore, individual differences, such as age, gender, learning style are also analyzed. The study provided several theoretical, methodological and pedagogical implications to L2 learning, L2 vocabulary research and interculture study. Key words: Vocabulary; Cultural connotation; TransferResume: Base sur la theorie de transfert et la theorie de fait d'etre marque psychotypologie de Kellerman, cette etude a ete concentree sur le transfert de connotation culturelle de vocabulaire des apprenants de EFL chinois. 216 sujets , certain sont specialises en anglais venant de trois universites chinoises ont participe a une serie de test dans l'etude. Base sur le grand nombre du test, cette etude a rapporte deux decouvertes importantes. D'abord, l'analyse de groupe entier a montre qu'il existe le transfert de connotation culturelle de vocabulaire parmi les apprenants de EFL chinois et la conscience culturelle des apprenants est positivement correlatif avec leur capacite de langue. Deuxiemement, l'analyse entre-groupe a indique que la capacite L2 etait negativement correlative avec la proportion de transfert de connotation culturelle de vocabulaire. La proportion de transfert de connotation culturelle de vocabulaire des apprenants tres doues etait inferieure que celui des apprenants qui ont peu de capacite. En outre, des differences individuelles, comme l'âge, le genre, le style d’apprendre sont aussi analyses. L'etude a fourni plusieurs implications theoriques, methodologiques et pedagogiques a l'etude de L2, L2 la recherche de vocabulaire et l'etude d'interculture.Mots-cles: Vocabulaire; Connotation culturelle; Transfert

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207