MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1769517315 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.09.048

Paradox of Protection: Preferential Recognition of CD4-induced Epitopes by Anti-HIV-1 ADCC Antibodies

2015· letter· en· W1769517315 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Matthew S. Parsons, Stephen J. Kent

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAntibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicityAntibodyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Vaccine trialMedicineEpitopeVirologyImmunologyMonoclonal antibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antibodies capable of eliminating HIV-1-infected cells via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) are present in most HIV-1-infected individuals. The ability of antibodies to trigger ADCC is associated with slower progression to AIDS, as well as vaccine-conferred protection from HIV-1 infection in the RV144 trial (Baum et al., 1996, Haynes et al., 2012). The RV144 trial enrolled over 16,000 subjects in Thailand. Half of the subjects were immunized with a prime-boost vaccine regimen that, although did not induce significant anti-HIV CD8 T cell or broad neutralizing antibody responses, did induce robust non-neutralizing antibody responses with ADCC function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207