PENGARUH KUALITAS PRODUK, e-SERVQUAL, DAN HARGA MELALUI KEPUASAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP KOMUNIKASI WORD OF MOUTH KONSUMEN ADORABLE PROJECTS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kualitas produk, e-SERVQUAL, dan harga terhadap kepuasan konsumen, serta pengaruh kepuasan konsumen sebagai variabel intervening terhadap komunikasi word of mouth . Responden pada penelitian ini adalah konsumen dari Adorable Projects. Data primer dan data sekunder telah terkumpul. Data sekunder dikumpulkan dari berbagai sumber seperti jurnal, buku, dan publikasi lainnya yang terkait dengan penelitian. Data primer diperoleh dengan menggunakan kuesioner yang dibagikan kepada target responden. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling , dan terkumpul sebanyak 100 responden. Berbagai uji statistik seperti uji validitas, reliabilitas dan uji asumsi klasik telah dilakukan. Dengan menggunakan analisis jalur diperoleh bahwa kualitas produk, e-SERVQUAL, dan harga berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kepuasan konsumen. Begitu pun dengan kepuasan konsumen yang berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap komunikasi word of mouth . Disarankan bahwa Adorable Projects harus dapat mempertahankan kualitas produknya serta meningkatkan efektifitas website , dan memberikan harga yang sesuai dengan produknya. Untuk penelitian selanjutnya, dapat menggunakan variabel lain untuk menganalisis kepuasan konsumen dan juga mengembangkan metode penelitian seperti penambahan jumlah responden, teknik penarikan sampel, maupun teknik analisis data. Kata kunci: kualitas produk, e-SERVQUAL, harga, kepuasan konsumen, word of mouth . This study aim to analyze the effect of product quality, e-SERVQUAL, and prices through consumer satisfaction, and the influence of consumer satisfaction as an intervening variable on word of mouth communication. Adorable Projects’ customers were taken as respondents. Both primary and secondary data were gathered. Secondary data were gathered from various sources such as journals, books and other related publications. Primary data were collected using questionnaire which were distributed to the target respondents. Using a purposive sampling technique, a total of 100 respondents were gathered. Various statistical tests such as validity, reliability and classical assumptions tests were employed. Using a Path Analysis it was found that product quality e-SERVQUAL and perceived price had a positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction, and also customer satisfaction had positive and significantly effect on word of mouth communication . Product quality was found. It is suggested that Adorable Projects should be able to maintain the quality of its products, improving the effectiveness of websites, and provide appropriate price with its products. Further research on, it can use other variables to analyze customer satisfaction, and also develop research methods such as increasing the number of respondents, sampling techniques, and data analysis techniques. Keywords: product quality, e-SERVQUAL, perceived price, customer satisfaction, word of mouth. Daftar Pustaka Akbar, M. M., & Parvez, N. (2009). Impact of Service Quality, Trust, and Customer Satisfaction on Customer Loyalty. ABAC Journal, Vol. 29 No. 1, 24-38. Allsop, D. T., Bassett, B. R., & Hoskins, J. A. (2007). Word of Mouth Research: Principles and Applications. Journal of Advertising Research , 398-411. Amanah, D. (2010). Pengaruh Harga dan Kualitas Produk terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Pada Majestyk Bakery dan Cake Shop Cabang H.M. Yamin Medan. Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis , 71-87. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Assauri, S. (2010). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada. Bakewell, C., & Mitchell, V. W. (2003). Generation Y Female Consumer Decision Making Style. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management , 95-106. Cengiz, E., & Yalya, H. E. (2007). The Effect of Marketing Mix on Positive Word of Mouth Communication: Evidence from Accounting Offices in Turkey. Innovative Marketing , 74-86. Dimitriades, Z. S. (2006). Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty and Commitment in Service Organizations . Management Research News , Vol. 29 No. 12, 782-800. Ghanimata, F., & Kamal, M. (2012). Analisis Pengaruh Harga, Kualitas Produk, dan Lokasi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Studi pada Pembeli Produk Bandeng Juwana Elrina Semarang). Jurnal Manajemen , 1-10. Ghozali, I. (2006). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS, Cetakan Keempat. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., & Marticotte, F. (2010). e-WOM Scale: Word of Mouth Measurement Scale for e-Services Context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences , 5-23. Jakpar, S., Na, A. G., Johari, A., & Myint, K. T. (2012). Examining the Product Quality Attributes That Influences Customer Satisfaction Most When the Price Was Discounted: A Case Study in Kuching Sarawak. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 3 No. 23, 221-236. Kartajaya, H. (2002). Hermawan Kartajaya on Marketing. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of Marketing. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Lee, G. G., & Lin, H. F. (2005). Customer Perceptions of e-Service Quality in Online Shopping. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, 161-176. Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2011). Service Marketing 7th Edition. England: Pearson Education Limited. Mulyono, B. H., Yoestini, Nugraheni, R., & Kamal, M. (2007). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen (Studi Kasus Pada Perumahan Puri Mediterania Semarang). Studi Manajemen dan Organisasi , 91. Musanto, T. (2004). Faktor-Faktor Kepuasan Pelanggan dan Loyalitas Pelanggan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan , 123-136. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality. Journal of Service Research, Vol. 7 No. X, 1-21. Purwati, Setiawan, H., & Rohmawati. (2012). Pengaruh Harga dan Kualitas Produk terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Motor Honda Matic Beat (Studi Kasus pada PT Nusantara Solar Sakti). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Informasi Akuntansi , 261. Saidani, B., & Arifin, S. (2012). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Kualitas Layanan terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen dan Minat Beli pada Ranch Market. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia , 9. Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2006). Consumer Behavior 7th Edition. London: Prentice Hall, Inc. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach 4th Edition. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc. Shaharudin, M. R., Mansor, S. W., Hassan, A. A., Omar, M. W., & Harun, E. H. (2011). The Relationship Between Product Quality and Purchase Intention: The Case of Malaysia's National Motorcycle/Scooter Manufacturer. African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5 No. 20, 8163-8176. Simamora, B. (2001). Memenangkan Pasar: Dengan Pemasaran yang Efektif dan Profitablel. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sugiyono. (Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). 2010. Bandung: Alfabeta. Suwarni, & Mayasari, S. D. (2009). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk dan Harga terhadap Loyalitas melalui Kepuasan Konsumen. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis , 77. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics 5th Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon Inc. Taghizadeh, H., Taghipourian, M. J., & Khazaei, A. (2013). The Effect of Costumer Satisfaction on Word of Mouth Communication. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology , 2569-2575. Tjiptono, F. (2004). Perspektif Manajemen dan Pemasaran Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Andi. Tjiptono, F., & Anantasia. (2006). Total Quality Management. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi. Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effect of Word of Mouth Versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site. Journal of Marketing , Vol. 73, 90-102. Umar, H. (2003). Metode Riset Prilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Wijaya, T. (2011). Manajemen Kualitas Jasa. Jakarta: PT Indeks. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service Quality Delivery Through Websites: A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , Vol. 30 No. 4, 358-371. Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods, 9th International Edition. Canada: Cengage Learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it