Historia de la literatura y comentario de texto en ELE : apuntes prácticos para la estructuración de un curso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jose Luis Ocasar Ariza (1962) es Doctor el Literatura Espanola y profesor de los Cursos de Extranjeros de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid desde 1990. Se ha dedicado a la ensenanza de ELE desde 1985 tambien en Mangold Eurocentres y la Universidad Internacional Menendez Pelayo de Santander, entre otros centros. Como formador de profesores ha impartido clases en los master y cursos de formacion de las universidades Complutense y Autonoma. Asimismo ha impartido conferencias sobre didactica de ELE en Avila, Varsovia, Dusseldorf, Valencia y Montreal. Es codirector de la coleccion de Lecturas Graduadas de la Editorial Edinumen y autor de diversos articulos sobre ensenanza de la Literatura en el ambito de las segundas lenguas. Tambien ha escrito dos novelas graduadas, Amnesia y Una musica tan triste, con sus explotaciones didacticas. Fuera del ambito de ELE, es profesor de Literatura, Cultura Clasica y Posmodernidad en la Universidad de Comillas, y autor de diversos libros y ediciones sobre literatura espanola del Renacimiento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".