Delamination and Separation of Aluminum-Polyethylene-Paper Packing Material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delamination and separation of laminated aluminum-polyethylene-paper packaging material were conducted for recycling packaging materials. Delamination was carried out using glacial acetic acid (GAA) solution. L9 (3 4 ) orthogonal experiments demonstrate that the most significant factor is GAA concentration followed by temperature and liquid/solid ratio. The delamination time decreased sharply with increasing temperature and the GAA concentration. The packaging material was delaminated under conditions of 60 C, 70 v% GAA solution, liquid/solid ratio 20:1 and delamination time 60 min, and separation of polyethylene, paper and aluminum foil was conducted through sink-float method and air separation. Polyethylene, paper and aluminum foil were separated efficiently. The recovery and purity of aluminum foil was 90.81% and 100%, respectively; the purity of polyethylene was 100%; the recovery and purity of paper was 100% and 96.03%, respectively. This study offers some technical insights for recycling of aluminum-plastic packaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".