MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1772844864 · doi:10.5376/ijms.2014.04.66

Spatial and Temporal Profiling of Macroalgal Groups on Rock Shore Platform: A Case Study from Dwarka

2014· article· en· W1772844864 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sanghvi Dimpal

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marine Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)ShoreOceanographyRocky shoreGeographyGeologyPhysical geographyRemote sensingEcologyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dwarka coast of Gujarat state from India has a stable shore platform. For this study, the shore platform was divided into three sections: i) northern, ii) central and iii) southern. Macroalgae growing on this shore platform were surveyed based on systematic random sampling for three months in sequence (April, June and October, 2013). On this site, total 36 taxa of macroalgae were identified through intensive fieldwork/ in situ survey based on Line Intercept Transect and Quadrate based methods. An overall analysis of the field data so far collected reveals that Chlorophyta dominates in the subtidal zone while Ochrophyta (Phaeophyta) dominates in rock pools near the cliff base as their preferred habitats. Rhodophyta showed a seasonal predominance during June. Iyengaria stellata was found in all the three months. The result obtained in this study provides an insight to understand the macroalgae habitat zonation on the shore platform and can be useful to support conservationof this study site as a rich macroalgae habitat of Indian Coast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207