Bibliographic record
Abstract
The labor placement system settled by “Employment Contracts Law” of china is obviously deficient in many aspects, it doesn’t clarify the definition and characteristic of labor placement, doesn’t establish legal liability system in accordance with obligations of stuffing firms and accepting units, doesn’t pay adequate attention to liability capacity of stuffing firms as employers. This causes a great number of abuses conducted by employers, damages essential rights and interests of employees, and effects the ordinary operation of labor placement. In order to remedy deficiencies mentioned above, the law shall conduct series of improvement measures to clarify the definition of labor placement, specify the range of labor control of stuffing firms and accepting units, establish legal liability system in accordance with labor protection obligations, restrict the situations, in which accepting units could use employees placed, improve the supervision measure toward stuffing units, establish a legal system for labor placement to work effectively. Key words: “Employment Contracts Law”, labor placement, labor control, employer’s liability Resume: Les defauts existent evidemment dans le systeme legal du travail detache du 《loi du travail》 chinois, il ne precise pas la notion et les particularite du travail detache, il n’ etablit pas un systeme de la responsabilite qui coordonne l’obligation de l’unite detachee avec l’unite acceptee, et il ne fait attention pas a l’aptitude responsible de l’ employeur. Cela engendre des actes d’abus de l’ employeur , entraine les prejudices directs de l’employe, embarrasse le fonctionnement du travail detache. Afin de resoudre les problems ci-dessus, la loi deverait prendre ses measures pour le render plus equipe, il faut preciser sa notion, stipuler la limite du controle du travail, et etablir le systeme de la responsabilite qui s'accorde avec l’obligation de la protection du travail. Mots-Cles:《Loi du Travail》, le travail detache, controle du travail, la responsabilite de l’ employeur
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".