MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UPPER EXTREMITY COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE RECEIVING HAEMODIALYSIS

2010· article· en· W1773328985 on OpenAlexafffund
Scott Hurton, John M. Embil, Andrew Reda, Susan Smallwood, Cathy Wall, Lily Thomson, James Zacharias, Mario Dascal, Elly Trepman, Joshua Koulack

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Renal Care · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
FundersHealth Resources and Services AdministrationUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Medical Service Foundation
KeywordsMedicineDashWeaknessSurgeryPopulationUpper limbChronic renal failureEnd stage renal diseaseHemodialysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limited data are available about disability associated with upper extremity complications in patients who receive haemodialysis for end-stage renal disease. In this study of 123 patients receiving haemodialysis, the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 31 ± 22 points, indicating markedly greater disability than in a normal population. Dupuytren's contracture was the most frequent deformity. Brachial, radial and ulnar pulses were present in most upper limbs, but 14 (14%) of 102 patients had poor arterial perfusion pressures. Diabetic patients had residual or complete loss of protective sensation more frequently than nondiabetic patients. Motor testing with the index finger abduction and fifth finger flexion tests showed a significantly greater frequency of weakness in diabetic than nondiabetic patients. In summary, upper extremity disability was noted in haemodialysis patients, including loss of protective sensation and motor strength, both in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Renal CareSame topicDupuytren's Contracture and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207