Bibliographic record
Abstract
In connection with the acute problem of energy supply, the Ukrainian government has high hopes for the significant shale gas resources, expected by geologists. In my article, I examined the geological resources of shale gas in Ukraine, the possibility of their transfer to the technically recoverable resources, timeframes of industrial development of the new kind of hydrocarbons and the possible role of shale gas in the future energy supply in I used published and Russian sources to assess shale gas resources of Dnieper-Donets depression (Yuzovskoe deposit) and Carpathian Depression (Olesskoe deposit). According to the report of the Energy Information Agency of the United States in June 2013, for Ukraine, it entails risky geological and unproven technically recoverable resources, for redeployment of which into real reserves the country needs significant amounts of drilling, financing and not less than five years of time. In the most optimistic scenario, the first commercial shale gas in could be received no earlier than in 5 years, and self-production of gas in (at least partial) could be achieved no earlier than in 10 years. shale gas; unconventional hydrocarbon resources; Ukraine; Dnieper-Donets Basin; Yuzovskoe deposit; Olesskoe deposit Aguilera R.F. Economics of Oil and Supply in the Former Soviet Union. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 35.6 (2012): 480–493. Anonymous. Canada Looks to Shales for Boost to Supply. Oil and Journal 107.46 (2009): 18–22. Asche F., Oglend A., Osmundsen P. Gas Versus Oil Prices: The Impact of Energy Policy 47 (2012): 117–124. Aslund A. Gazprom: Challenged Giant in Need of Reform. Russia after the Global Economic Crisis. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2010, pp. 151–168. Boersma T., Johnson C. Revolution: US and EU Policy and Research Agendas. Review of Policy Research 29.4 (2012): 570–576. Bunger J.M., Crowford P.M., Johnson H.R. Is Oil America's Answer to Peak-Oil Challenge?. Oil and Journal 102.30 (2004): 16–24. Business On Blood: Deposits of Not Give Rest to U.S. News. Internet Newspaper. Russian State TV & Radio Company, 18 May 2014. Web. . (In Russian). Crockett J., Morse D. New Albany in Illinois: Emerging Play or Prolific Source. Oil and Journal 108.33 (2010): 72–79. Deutch J. Good News about Gas-The Natural Revolution and Its Consequences. Foreign Affairs 90 (2011): 82–84. Donetsk Republic Has Banned Production of on Its Territory. Dialogue. HOTSPORT Ltd., 21 May 2014. Web. . (In Russian). Dreyen I., Stang G. Revolution': Challenges and Implications for the EU. EUISS Brief 11 (2013). PDF file. . Horsfield B., Schulz H.-M. Shale Exploration and Exploitation. Marine and Petroleum Geology 31.1 (2012): 1–2. Jaffe A.M. Shale Will Rock the World. Wall Street Journal 10 May 2010. Web. . Kristoffersen S.-A. Potential in An Assessment of a Large Opportunity. Bahrain: Lulu.com, 2010. eBook (PDF). Krivosheev P. Battles for Slavyansky and News Agency Rosbalt N.p., 14 May 2014. Web. . (In Russian). Law B.E., Ulmishek G.F., Kabyshev B.P., Pashova N.T., Krivosheya V.A. Basin-Centered Evaluated in Dnieper-Donets Basin, Donbas Foldbelt, Ukraine. Oil and Journal 96.47 (1998): 74–78. Machulina S.A., Yaroshenko A.V., Dakhnova M.V., Vakarchuk S.G., Strizhak L.I., Mozhegova S.V. Paleozoic Domanikoid Strata at Southwestern Margin of the Donbass. Proceedings of the VII International Conference “New Ideas in Geology and Geochemistry of Oil and Gas. Actual Problems in Geology and Geochemistry of Oil and (In Memory of B.A. Sokolov and V.V. Semenovich)”. Moscow: GEOS Publisher, 2004, pp. 335–456. (In Russian). Medlock K.B., Jaffe A.M., Hartley P.R. and US National Security. Houston, TX: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University, 2011. Polityuk P., Balmforth R. Ukraine Signs $10 Billion Deal with Chevron. Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 5 Nov. 2013. Web. . Rogers H. Shale – the Unfolding Story. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 27.1 (2011): 117–143. Sachsenhofer R.F., Koltun Y.V. Black Shales in – A Marine and Petroleum Geology 31.1 (2012): 125–136. Sachsenhofer R. F., Shymanovsky V. A., Bechtel A., Gratzer R., Horsfield B., Reischenbacher D. Palaeozoic Source Rocks in the Dniepr–Donets Basin, Ukraine. Petroleum Geoscience 16.4 (2010): 377–399. Schulz H.-M., Horsfield B., Sachsenhofer R.F. Shale in Europe: A Regional Overview and Current Research Activities. Geological Society. Petroleum Geology Conference Series. London: Geological Society of London, 2010, volume 7, pp. 1079–1085. Stevens P. The 'Shale Revolution': Hype and Reality. London: Chatham House, 2010. The First Ukrainian Well Will Be Drilled in July. Korrespondent.net. Correspondent Ltd., 27 Jan. 2014. Web. . (In Russian). Tsvetkov L.D., Nsvetkova N.L. Hydrocarbons. Bibliographic Review. Yaroslavl: Nedra Publisher, 2012. (In Russian). Ukrainian Media: Russia ‘Occupied’ Slovyansk Because of Large Field. News Agency Rosbalt N.p., 28 Apr. 2012. Web. . (In Russian). U.S. Department of Energy. Modern Development in the United States: A Primer, DE-FG26-04NT15455. Department of Energy. Office of Fossil Energy and National Technology Laboratory. Office of Fossil Energy, April 2009, PDF-file . Ulmishek G.F. Petroleum Geology and Resources of the Dnieper-Donets Basin, and Russia. Geological Survey Bulletin 2201-EU.S. Department of the Interior Geological Survey Department of the Interior, 2001. PDF-file. . US Energy Information Administration. Technically Recoverable Oil and Resources: An Assessment of 137 Formation in 41 Countries Outside the United States. EIA Independent Statistics & Analysis. Energy Information Administration, 10 June 2013. Web. . Kiseleva, N. L. in Ukraine: Hopes, Reality, and Politics. Space and Time 2 (2014): 258–263. (In Russian). Fixed network address 2226-7271provr_st2-16.2014.93.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".