Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the armies of the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente went off to war, governments in Asia and Asia Minor met to consider the possibility of their participation. Since 1902, Japan had an alliance with Great Britain, one that committed it to “strict neutrality” in case Great Britain became “involved in war with another Power.” What leaders in Tokyo saw as the great “confusion” in Europe could spell opportunity for Japan to assert itself as the “chief nation of the Orient.” Foreign Minister Katō Takaaki and a handful of his closest advisors single-handedly took the government into the war. And in Constantinople, a handful of Young Turk leaders, Enver Bey, Talât Bey, Ahmed Cemal Pasha, and Helil Bey, decided that alliance with Germany would best serve their nation's interests. Germany became their last and unavoidable choice – to establish their economic independence, to abolish the Anglo-French financial “capitulations,” and to secure their crumbling empire. Japan The Japanese Cabinet decided on war against Germany on 8 August, just four days after Britain cut ties with Berlin. Why did Japan, so far from the principal theater of conflict, declare war on Germany? Elder statesman Inoue Kaoru spoke of the outbreak of war in Europe as “divine aid,” this based on his sense of widespread exhilaration in Tokyo. Just as British Prime Minister David Lloyd George hailed the chance to rediscover “the great peaks” of “Honour, Duty, Patriotism,” Japanese adventurer Ioki Ryōzō praised the “awakening” of the Japanese from their petty political battles, worship of money, “anti-state nihilism,” “naturalism,” and “vulgar sensualism.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".