MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Public Official Endowment Insurance System Of My Eyes

2010· article· en· W1774397420 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liu Yushan

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndowment policyPolitical scienceSocial securityEndowmentPopulationPublic administrationHumanitiesSociologyLawDemographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With arrivation of age population times and requestion of the social security system perfected gradually, our country functionary retirement system of public official already shows a lot of abuse now. This article thinks that the public official is the peculiar occupation group, whose endowment insurance responds to road of visiting social insurance. Key words: endowment insurance, public official, retirement Resume: Avec le vieillissement de la population et la demande du perfectionnement du systeme d’assurance sociale, se sont manifestes des inconvenients du systeme de retraite des fonctionnaires en vigueur de notre pays. Apres l’analyse, l’auteur pense que les fonctionnaires sont un groupe professionnel special, dont l’assurance¬ vieillesse doit prendre la voie de l’assurance sociale. Mots-cles: assurance-vieillesse, fonctionnaires, retraite 摘要:隨著人口老齡化時代的到來和逐漸完善社會保障制度的要求,我國現有的公務員退休制度已顯露出 眾多弊端。本文在經過分析後認為,公務員作為特殊的職業群體,其養老保險應走社會保險之路。 關鍵詞:養老保險;公務員;退休

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicRegional Development and EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207