MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1775729564 · doi:10.5539/mas.v9n8p13

Isothermal Pneumatc Molding of Dome-Shaped Parts of Anisotropic Material in Short-Time Creeping Mode

2015· article· en· W1775729564 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. S. Yakovlev, С.Н. Ларин, В. И. Платонов

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Technology and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationRussian Foundation for Fundamental Investigations
KeywordsIsothermal processBlankMaterials scienceDome (geology)AnisotropyMechanicsKinematicsMolding (decorative)Stress (linguistics)Composite materialFlow (mathematics)Classical mechanicsGeologyPhysicsThermodynamicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studying isothermal straining of dome-shaped shells with the aim of evaluating kinematics of the material flow, stress and strained conditions, force conditions, geometrical dimensions of shells and possibility frontier of straining. The theoretical study of the isothermal straining processes has been performed on the basis of the theory of short-time creeping of anisotropic material. There has been revealed the influence of technological parameters, conditions of loading, and geometry of working tools on the kinematics of material flow produced by friction conditions on the blank and tool contact surfaces, stress and strain states, force conditions, possibility frontiers of form-shaping of operations of isothermal deforming of dome-shaped shells made out of high-strength anisotropic materials. Conclusions. The equations obtained can be used for theoretical analysis of operations of isothermal straining of dome-shaped shells in the mode of short-time creeping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicEngineering Technology and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207