MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1775851353 · doi:10.1109/hpsr.2000.856663

A flexible multipoint-to-point traffic control algorithm for ABR services in ATM networks

2002· article· en· W1775851353 on OpenAlexaffabout
Uyen Trang Nguyen, I. Katzela

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkAsynchronous Transfer ModeBandwidth (computing)Bandwidth allocationScheme (mathematics)Flexibility (engineering)Distributed computingIntegrated Services Digital NetworkTraffic shapingNetwork traffic control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traffic control for point-to-multipoint ABR services in ATM networks has been studied extensively, but this is not the case for multipoint-to-point (mp-p) traffic control. No consensus has been reached concerning the issue of fairness of bandwidth allocation among multipoint connections, or between point-to-point and multipoint connections. Existing mp-p traffic control schemes for ABR services either support only a limited set of fairness definitions, or are not effective. We define a new type of fairness, and propose a flexible multipoint-to-point traffic control scheme for ABR services. The proposed scheme supports cell merging at both virtual path (VP) and virtual connection (VC) levels, and implements all existing types of fairness currently defined in the literature for mp-p communications. This flexibility allows the network to meet various bandwidth requirements of different application streams. It also permits switch vendors to quickly configure their switches to meet clients' requirements, despite the lack of consensus on the issue of fairness definition. While being flexible, the new algorithm is also fair, fast and robust. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme is fair, and performs as well as, or better than existing mp-p traffic control schemes. It is also easy to incorporate the new algorithm into a multipoint-to-multipoint traffic control scheme such as the framework proposed by Ren, Siu and Suzuki (see IEEE International Conference on Communications, Montreal, Canada, June 1997, and Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol.30, no.19, p.1793-1810, 1998).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207