Consenso Internacional sobre la Radiología Intervencionista
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consenso desarrollado por Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR, USA), Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE, Europe), Austrian Society of Interventional Radiology (OGIR, Austria), Brazilian Society of Interventional Radiology and Endovascular Surgery (SoBRICE, Brazil), British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR, United Kingdom), Bulgarian Society of Interventional Radiology (Bulgaria), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA, Canada), CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Section within the Singapore Radiological Society (CVIR section of the SRS, Singapore), Cardiovascular and Interventional Society of Turkey (TGRD, Turkey), Chinese Society of Interventional Radiology (CSIR, China), Croatian Society of Radiology (CSR, Croatia), Czech Society of Interventional Radiology (CSIR, Czech Republic), Danish Society of Interventional Radiology (DFIR, Denmark), Dutch Society of Interventional Radiology (NGIR, Netherlands), Egyptian Society of Interventional Radiology (ESIR, Egypt), Finnish Society of Interventional Radiology (FSIR, Finland), Georgian Association of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (GACIR, Georgia), German Society of Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR, Germany), Hellenic Society of Interventional Radiology (GSIR, Greece), Hong Kong Society of Interventional Radiology (HKSIR, China), Hungarian Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (HSIR, Hungary), IberoAmerican Society of Interventionism (SIDI, Latin America), Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (ISVIR, India), Interventional Radiology Section, Polish Medical Society of Radiology (PLTR, Poland), Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia (IRSA, Australia and New Zealand), Irish Society of Interventional Radiology (ISIR, Ireland), Israeli Society of Interventional Radiology (ILSIR, Israel), Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology (JSIR, Japan), Korean Society of Interventional Radiology (KSIR, Korea), Pan Arab Interventional Radiology Society (PAIRS, Lebanon), Philippine Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (PSVIR, Philippines), Portuguese Section of Interventional Radiology (NURIP) of the Portuguese Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (SPRMN, Portugal), Section of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology of the Royal Belgian Radiological Society (RBRS, Belgium), Seldinger Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SSVIR, Sweden), Sezione di Studio della SIRM di Radiologia Vascolare ed Interventistica (SIRM, Italy), Sociedad Argentina de Radiologia (SAR, Argentina), Society of Interventional OncoRadiology (RSIOR, Russia), Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI, Spain), Swiss Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SSCVIR, Switzerland), Taiwanese Radiological Society (Taiwan), Thai Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (TSVIR, Thailand), and the Working Group of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology of the Slovak Radiological Society (PSKVIR, Slovak Republic).*
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".