MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1778488670 · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v8n6p95

Association Between Characteristics of Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients With Their Needs

2015· article· en· W1778488670 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maria Polikandrioti, John Goudevenos, Lampros K. Michalis, Ioannis Κoutelekos, Elpida Georgiadi, Constantine Karakostas, Moses Elisaf

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Journal of Health Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureLife expectancyMarital statusStatistical significanceInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseTest (biology)Environmental healthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: During recent years that life expectancy of heart failure patients has been increased, health professionals put more emphasis on assessing their needs in daily clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to explore the association between characteristics of hospitalized heart failure patients with their needs. METHODS: A sample of 190 hospitalized patients with HF, recruited from public hospitals in Greece, was enrolled in the study. Data were collected by the completion of a questionnaire which included socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and the questionnaire "Needs of hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease" which is consisted of 6 subscales. Statistical methods used were Kruskal wallis-test or Mann-Whitney test and Spearmans' rho coefficient. Multiple regression analysis was performed in order to evaluate the association between patients' characteristics and the significance of their needs. RESULTS: 124 (65.3%) of hospitalized heart failure participants were men and 89 (46.8%) of participants were more than 70 years old. 145 (76.3%) had prior experience of hospitalization due to heart failure. The need for support and guidance was statistically significantly associated with the degree of information, (p=<0.001). The need for information from the medical and nursing staff was significantly associated with marital status and degree of information (p=0.001 and p<0.001 respectively). The need for need for being in contact with other patient groups, and ensuring communication with relatives was statistically significantly associated with the professional status and degree of information, (p=0.037 and p=<0.001 respectively). The need for individualized treatment and the need for patient's personal participation to his/her treatment as well as the need to meet the emotional and physical needs were statistically significant associated with the degree of information, (p=<0.001, p=<0.001 respectively). Lastly, the need to trust the medical and nursing staff was statistically significantly associated with the place of residence and the degree of information, (p=0.023 and p<0.001). These results were confirmed by the multiple linear regression after controlling for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Information seems to be of vital importance when assessing the needs of heart failure patients. Therefore, providing elaborate information should be an integral part of their therapeutic regimen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Journal of Health ScienceSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207