Tunnel behaviour associated with the weak Alpine rock masses of the Driskos Twin Tunnel system, Egnatia Odos Highway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the excessive deformations and support failure encountered during tunnel construction at the Driskos Twin Tunnel site in Northern Greece, this paper provides insight on how tunnels designed in such weak rock environments can be realistically analyzed with a view of determining better analytical tools to predict deformations and improving current design methods. Specific factors that were assessed include rock strength based on the geological strength index (GSI), tunnel deformation, numerical analysis techniques employed, three-dimensional model type, support considerations, dilation, sequencing of tunnel excavation, influence of single bore construction on twin bore, and homogenization of tunnel faces. This work involves the use of nominally identical two- and three-dimensional numerical models of tunnel sequencing for analytical simulation of weak material behaviour and sequential tunnel deformation response with the goal of investigating the strength and deformation of such weak rock masses. These have been used in combination with monitoring data that were obtained in the field during the Driskos Twin Tunnel construction. A discussion of the geological conditions, material property determination, monitoring data, and model calibration strategy is given. This paper provides insight into these issues and poses many more fundamental questions regarding the analysis of tunnel excavation within weak rock masses requiring further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".