Descriptif d’un programme de stages hospitaliers de 3, 6 et 12 mois pour les étudiants en pharmacie français au CHU Sainte-Justine (Montréal, Québec)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectif : l’objectif de cet article est de presenter le bilan de stages offerts a des etudiants etrangers et de proposer un programme structure de stage en pharmacie. Materiel et methode : il s’agit d’une etude descriptive d’un programme de stages hospitaliers de 3, 6 et 12 mois pour les etudiants en pharmacie francais au CHU Sainte-Justine (Montreal, Quebec), elabore a partir des programmes academiques quebecois et francais et du bilan des 10 dernieres annees d’encadrement de stagiaires etrangers. Resultats : la recherche documentaire permet de dresser un bilan comparatif du type de diplome et des stages cliniques des formations de base et complementaire des etudiants en pharmacie aux Etats-Unis, au Quebec et en France. L’etude presente un descriptif comparatif des stages cliniques offerts au CHU Sainte-Justine aux etudiants de 1 er et 2 e cycles de l’Universite de Montreal, aux etudiants etrangers ainsi que leur participation a des activites creatrices de recherche appliquee. Cent quarante-trois projets realises avec la contribution significative d’etudiants en pharmacie ont donne lieu a la presentation de 54 resumes structures avec communications affichees dans un congres et de 89 publications dans des revues scientifiques. De 1996 a 2007, les etudiants etrangers ont contribue a 35 % des activites creatrices bien que leur presence ne represente que 23 % des jours-presence etudiants. Conclusion : cette etude montre que, malgre les differences de formation et de reconnaissance des diplomes entre pays, la realisation de stages en pharmacie dans les etablissements de sante quebecois est realiste et que la diffusion d’un programme structure peut contribuer a repondre aux attentes des personnes impliquees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".