Optimization of electromagnetic wave focusing in heterogeneous biological tissue model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents some optimization approaches to the electromagnetic wave focusing in heterogeneous biological tissue model. The model of human arm was used for investigation. The possibility of focusing of electromagnetic wave optimisation is strongly connected with investigation of electromagnetic wave propagation through complicated heterogeneous biological structure. Firstly we concentrated on the influence of particular structures thickness on scattering parameters value which gives us information about transmission and reflection of electromagnetic wave on interfaces of structures which differ by dielectric parameters. The next simulation showed the influence of water bolus placed on the arm model surface on values of SAR and consequently the possibility to avoid the overheating of upper region of arm model in the process of microwave hyperthermia. The next step connected with possible optimisation of electromagnetic wave focusing showed the influence of metamaterial structure placed in the front of microwave patch antenna used in role of microwave hyperthermia applicator on the electromagnetic wave focusing. The simulations were done for various numbers of metamaterial structures and various distances from arm model. Finally we simulated the focusing accuracy in the case when the combination of water bolus with metamaterial structure was used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it