"The Time is Out of Joint": Temporal Disorders in the Late Modern Condition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is my contention here that the complex temporal order, or this manifold way in which very different areas of practire can be interrelated by their common participation in the same temporal order â which I will reduce to the formula âprogressive literarityâ â today is âout of joingâ. My main task here consists in an inventory of some of these âtemporal discordersâ in order to create the possibility of evaluating pertaining to the same configuration of temporal change. According to my hypothesis, these disorders constute symptoms â and in their coincidence a syndrome â of the crisis of modernity. They are part of the late modern condition , which is also ours. According to this point of view, modern manipulation and control of time loses ground, wealens in terms of functonam efficiency, raises cognitive doubts. Itâs precisely through its cracks that we regain the freedon not only to see, but also to accept the multilayered complexity of our temporal experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".