MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1782187318 · doi:10.3233/isb-00190

Evolutionary Analysis of Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Angiopoietin, and Tyrosine Endothelial Kinase Involved in Angiogenesis and Immunity

2005· article· en· W1782187318 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anton Dormer, Gregory Beck

Bibliographic record

VenueIn Silico Biology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsAngiogenesisVascular endothelial growth factor BVascular endothelial growth factorAngiopoietinVascular endothelial growth factor AVascular endothelial growth factor CBiologyCell biologyReceptor tyrosine kinaseTyrosine kinaseCancer researchImmunologySignal transductionVEGF receptors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiopoietin (ANG) and tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor homology domains (TIE)-2 consist of a grouping of proteins that are involved in vascular homeostasis, vascular integrity and angiogenesis. There are nine proteins in the immediate VEGF family: VEGFA, VEGFB, VEGFC, VEGFD, VEGF-3, placental growth factor (PGF), VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1, VEGFR-2, and VEGFR-1-related. They can be stimulated by cytokines to become involved in immune responses. By using in silico tools, we were able to identify several possible analogues or homologues of VEGF, ANG and TIE-2 in invertebrates. This is the first report to show that these proteins may be conserved through evolution. These proteins may have a role in vascular maintenance and immunity. In addition, since VEGF, ANG and TIE-2 have a role in mammalian immunity that is significantly influenced by cytokines, such as IL-1, this may indicate an interaction of the vascular system and the immune system over evolutionary time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIn Silico BiologySame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207