Efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and Isoniazid-Resistant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin with and without Isoniazid Chemoprophylaxis from Day of Vaccination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY _ Field trials to determine the efficiency of conventional bacillus Calmette-Cuerin and isoniazid resistant bacillus Calmette-Cuerin, with and without isoniazid chemoprophylaxis from the day of vaccination for an 8-week period, were carried out ~n a population with a high incidence of tuber culosis (new' case rate). During the period of observation, bacillus Calmette-Cuerin vaccination reduced the new case rate of tuberculosis to approximately 20 per cent of the amount that occurred among tuberculin nonreactors without vaccination; however, there was no difference in the re duction of cases between conventional Montreal bacillus Calmette-Guerin and isoniazid-resistant bacillus Calmette-Cuerin derived from the same strain with or without concomitant isoniazid chemoprophylaxis. Therefore, a potent strain of bacillus Calmette-Cuerin and isoniazid can be given concomitantly without decreasing the protection afforded by conventional bacillus Calmette Guerin; thus, vaccination with an isoniazid-resistant bacillus Calmettc-Cuerin is not justified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".