MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1786406663

Memories Resurrected In Context: Gender and Remembrance in Charlotte Black's Scrapbook

2006· article· en· W1786406663 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Simonson

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtContext (archaeology)HistoryEthnologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article focuses on a scrapbook compiled by Charlotte Black, a Home Economics student who graduated from the Manitoba Agricultural College in 1925. The scrapbook, held at the University of Manitoba Archives and Special Collections, contains postcards, letters, invitations, memorabilia, and numerous photographs; and presents a snapshot of student life at the Manitoba Agricultural College. Scrapbooks are often disparaged as archival records. But in exploring the social and personal circumstances of the creator, scrapbooks can be read more critically, and their full value as archival records better understood. RESUME Cet article fait le point sur un spicilege compile par Charlotte Black, une etudiante en economie menagere qui a obtenu son diplome du College agricole du Manitoba en 1925. Le spicilege, depose aux Archives et collections speciales de l’Universite du Manitoba, comprend des cartes postales, des lettres, des invitations, des souvenirs et plusieurs photographies, ce qui permet de donner une vue d’ensemble de la vie etudiante au College agricole du Manitoba. Les spicileges sont souvent deprecies comme documents d’archives. Mais en explorant les circonstances sociales et personnelles de leurs createurs, les spicileges peuvent etre lus d’un oeil plus critique, et l’on parvient a mieux apprecier leur pleine valeur comme documents d’archives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207