MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adaptação do HCM2000 para análise da capacidade e do nível de serviço em rodovias de pista simples no Brasil

2011· article· pt· W1787679356 on OpenAlex
José Reynaldo Setti, José Elievam Bessa, Márcia Lika Mon-Ma, Cíntia Yumiko Egami

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportes · 2011
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A meta deste trabalho foi descrever, de maneira prática, como aplicar uma adaptação do método do HCM2000 para análise da capacidade e do nível de serviço em rodovias de pista simples brasileiras. A adaptação proposta resulta de duas pesquisas que, basicamente, replicaram os procedimentos usados no desenvolvimento do método original do HCM, substituindo os dados obtidos em rodovias dos EUA e Canadá por dados coletados em dez trechos de rodovias brasileiras. Dessa forma, são apresentadas relações entre a taxa de fluxo, a velocidade média de viagem e a porcentagem de tempo seguindo em pelotões, além de tabelas com fatores de ajuste para condições não básicas. Podem ser avaliados segmentos longos e homogêneos, numa análise em sentido duplo ou em senti-do único, além de rampas específicas. Os resultados obtidos indicam que as estimativas dos níveis de serviço usando-se a adaptação do método do HCM2000 tendem a refletir melhor as reais condições operacionais das vi-as brasileiras de pista simples. ABSTRACTThe goal of this study was to describe, in a practical way, how to apply an adaptation of HCM2000 method for capacity and level of service analysis on two-lane rural highways. The proposed adaptation is the result of two research projects that basically replicated the procedures used for developing the original HCM method, while replacing the data collected on highways in the U.S. and Canada for data from ten sections of Brazilian high-ways. Thus, relationships between flow rate, average travel speed and percent time-spent-following are present-ed, as well as tables containing adjustment factors for situations differing from base conditions. It is possible to estimate the level of service of long homogeneous segments, considering one-way or two-way flows, as well as specific upgrades. The results indicate that the level of service estimates obtained with the use of the HCM2000 adaptation tend to reflect better the actual highway conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it