MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1787767920 · doi:10.1007/s00417-015-3191-z

Levodopa as a possible treatment of visual loss in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy

2015· article· en· W1787767920 on OpenAlex
Deanna P. Lyttle, Lenworth N. Johnson, Edward Margolin, Richard Madsen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGraefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual acuityMedicineAnterior ischemic optic neuropathyOphthalmologyLevodopaVisual fieldOptic neuropathyNerve fiber layerConfidence intervalRetinalOptic nerveInternal medicineParkinson's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical effectiveness and potential neuroprotection of levodopa in improving visual acuity, visual field, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in eyes affected by NAION. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study involving 59 eyes of 59 participants with NAION who were evaluated within 15 days of NAION onset. Participants received 25 mg carbidopa/100 mg levodopa three times daily with meals for 12 weeks (levodopa group) or were untreated (control group). Best-corrected visual acuity converted to logMAR, mean deviation (MD) threshold sensitivity on automated perimetry, and mean RNFL thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) were assessed. The primary outcome was the categorization of eyes into improved visual acuity (by 0.3 logMAR difference), worsened visual acuity (by 0.3 logMAR difference), or no change in visual acuity. The proportions in each category were compared between the levodopa and control groups. RESULTS: Among participants with 20/60 or worse initial visual acuity, levodopa-treated participants had significant improvement (P < 0.0001) in the mean change from initial to final logMAR visual acuity of -0.74 ± 0.56 (95 % CI, -0.98 to -0.50), while the mean change for the control group at -0.37 ± 1.09 (95 % confidence interval estimate, -1.00 to +0.26) was not significant (P = 0.23). A significant difference between groups was observed (P = 0.0086) such that 19/23 (83 %) in the levodopa group improved and none got worse, as compared with 6/14 (43 %) in the control group improving while four (29 %) worsened. The change in visual field MD and RNFL thickness on OCT showed no significant difference at P = 0.23 and P = 0.75 respectively. No levodopa-treated participant had any adverse event from the levodopa. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment within 15 days of onset of NAION with levodopa improved central visual acuity by an average of 6 lines on Snellen acuity chart. Levodopa may promote neuroprotection of the maculopapular retinal ganglion cell fibers in NAION.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it