MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 5960: Implementation of Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimation on a Commercial Ultrasound Scanner

2008· article· en· W178796845 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauren M. Leodore, Corina Leung, Laurent Pelissier, Flemming Forsberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubharmonicAcousticsAmplitudeTransducerCenter frequencyHydrostatic pressureScannerUltrasoundBiomedical engineeringBandwidth (computing)Ultrasonic sensorMedicineSecond-harmonic imaging microscopyPhysicsOpticsNonlinear systemTelecommunicationsLaserComputer scienceSecond-harmonic generationMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project aims to monitor and quantify intra-cardiac pressures via contrast-enhanced subharmonic imaging. We have proposed subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE; U.S. Patent 6,302,845) utilizing microbubble-based contrast agent signals for the noninvasive estimation of hydrostatic blood pressures in the heart cavities and in this study implemented real-time SHAPE on a commercial US scanner. An experimental pulse-echo system for SHAPE was constructed based on two single element transducers assembled confocally at a 60° angle to each other. A transducer with a bandwidth of 38% and a center frequency of 2.2 MHz (Staveley, East Hartford, CT) was used as the transmitter and a second transducer with a bandwidth of 86% and a center frequency of 3.6 MHz (Etalon Inc., Lebanon, IN) was the receiver. Changes in first, second, and subharmonic amplitudes of 6 different US contrast agents were measured in vitro at hydrostatic pressures from 0 –186 mmHg, acoustic pressures from 0.35– 0.60 MPa and frequencies of 2.5– 6.6 MHz. The optimal parameters for SHAPE were determined using linear regression analysis and implemented on a Sonix RP scanner (Ultrasonix Medical Corp, Richmond, Canada). The real-time implementation of SHAPE was tested in vitro. Over the pressure range studied the 1st and 2nd harmonic amplitudes reduced ~2 dB for all US contrast agents. Over the same pressure range, the subharmonic amplitudes decreased by 10 –14 dB and excellent linear regressions were achieved with the hydrostatic pressure variations (r 2 >0.98, p < 0.001). The optimal sensitivity for SHAPE was achieved at a transmit frequency of 2.5 MHz (i.e., receiving at 1.25 MHz) at a 0.35 MPa acoustic pressure using Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) which declined ~14.4 dB in vitro. A Sonix RP scanner was modified to implement SHAPE on a phased array transducer PA4 –2 with a frequency range from 1.5– 4.5 MHz. A pulse inversion technique was used and the subharmonic signals are displayed in real-time and can also be stored for off-line analysis. SHAPE offers the possibility of allowing pressure gradients in the heart to be obtained noninvasively. Future studies will include in vivo pressure measurements. Supported by AHA grant no 06554414 and NIH HL081892. This research has received full or partial funding support from the American Heart Association, AHA Great Rivers Affiliate (Delaware, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania & West Virginia).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207