MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1788605047 · doi:10.1002/eji.201344046

<scp>S</scp>os1 regulates sustained <scp>TCR</scp>‐mediated <scp>E</scp>rk activation

2014· article· en· W1788605047 on OpenAlexaff
Mateusz P. Poltorak, Ines Meinert, James C. Stone, Burkhart Schraven, Luca Simeoni

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsT-cell receptorCell biologyBiologyPhosphorylationT cellGuanine nucleotide exchange factorSignal transductionImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The duration and/or the magnitude of Ras-Erk activation are known to be crucial for cell-fate decisions. In T cells, sustained Erk activation correlates with differentiation/proliferation, whereas transient Erk activation parallels with unresponsiveness/apoptosis. The mechanism by which Son of sevenless (Sos) proteins and Ras guanyl-releasing protein 1 (RasGRP1) contribute to dynamics of Erk activation in mature T cells is not yet known. Here, we have assessed this issue using stimuli inducing either transient or sustained TCR signaling and RNA interference mediated suppression of Sos1, Sos2, and RasGRP1 expression in primary human T cells. We found that transient Erk activation depends on RasGRP1 but not on Sos. Conversely, sustained Erk signaling and T-cell activation depend on both Sos1 and RasGRP1. In summary, our data show for the first time that the two guanine nucleotide exchange factors expressed in T cells are differentially involved in the regulation of the duration of Erk phosphorylation and T-cell activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207