MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1790129847 · doi:10.15287/afr.2008.153

Molecular mapping of the Pinus monticola Cr2 gene using AFLP and SCAR markers

2008· article· en· W1790129847 on OpenAlexaff
Ekramoddoullah A.K.M., J J Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Forest Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sport Centre Pacific
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplified fragment length polymorphismBulked segregant analysisRAPDBiologyGenetic markerMolecular markerGeneticsMarker-assisted selectionGeneGene mappingChromosomeGenetic diversityPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

White pine blister rust (WPBR), caused by Cronartium ribicola, is a devastating disease in five-needle pines. Genetic resistance is an important component of integrated strategies to control WPBR. The major resistance gene Cr2, discovered by Kinloch etal.(1999), is also effective against British Columbia (BC) isolates of WPBR (Hunt et al. 2004). Pyramiding Cr2 gene with other resistancegenes is being pursued as a strategy in BC white pine breeding. To facilitate this strategy, we have recently identified a few RAPD markerslinked to Cr2 at one side (Liu et al. 2006). The objective of the present study was to identify amplified fragment length polymorphism(AFLP) markers linked to both sides of Cr2 for its more precise apping. Use of the AFLP technique combined with bulked segregant analysis (BSA) and haploid segregation analysis allowed the identification of five AFLP markers. Of these five AFLP markers in the Cr2 linkage, markers EacccMccgat-365, EactgMcccac- 290, and EacagEacag-750 werelinked in coupling and EacagMcccag-160r and EacccMccgat-180r in repulsion. Following cloning and sequencing of the AFLP andRAPD markers, specific PCR primers were designed and used in the amplification of sequence characterized amplified region(SCAR) markers at both sides of Cr2. EacccMccgat- 365 and RAPD marker U570-843 reported previously were converted into SCARmarkers. These two SCARs segregated in a 1:1 (presence:absence) ratio and the scoring cosegregated with their respective AFLP orRAPD marker. The SCAR marker EacccMccgat- 365-scar was positioned at 3.1 Kosambi cM from one side of Cr2 and U570-843-scarlocalized at 1.4 Kosambi cM from other side. Both SCAR markers can be useful in breeding programs with marker-assisted selection procedureto screen for resistance. This study represents the first report of the development of PCR-based sequence-specific markers linkedto blister rust resistance in five-needle pines. These findings may improve the precision of molecular breeding for blister rust resistanceand could be the staging point for isolating the Cr2 gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Forest ResearchSame topicYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFrench-language works237,207