Can New Diagnostic Criteria of Rheumatoid Arthritis Really Do An Early Diagnosis? -A Case Report of Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Traditional Medicine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic disease in which immunologically mediated inflammation of synovia-lined joints can result in marked disruption of joint structure and function. In Traditional Chinese Medicine（TCM）, it belongs to Be Syndrom, the outcome of the struggle between body resistance and pathogenic factors. RA is a highly disabling disease of which untreated patients show about 50% disability in two years. One cause of the high morbidity of RA is the long latency from the onset of symptoms to the definitive diagnosis of RA and the initiation of appropriate treatment. The difficult to make diagnoses of early RA since the early manifestations were atypical and the lack of specific diagnostic methods. This case is about the effectiveness of TCM treatment of patients with early RA which is reflected in both the diagnosis part and the treatment process. The patient in this case , Male, 56 years old, had been diagnosed of RA by TCM almost ten years earlier than that his symptoms could reach the Western diagnostic requirements. The important role of preventive thought -preventive treatment of diseases- in TCM in the early diagnosis and treatment of RA needs to be emphasized. It can be a practical way to treat RA with early TCM diagnose and treatment that impact disease activity and ultimately have been shown to slow or arrest structural joint damage, and then turn up to Western medicine treatment if the patient's symptoms reach the Western diagnostic requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".