MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1793083427 · doi:10.1029/2005gb002484

Holocene climate and carbon cycle dynamics: Experiments with the “green” McGill Paleoclimate Model

2005· article· en· W1793083427 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yi Wang, Lawrence A. Mysak, Nigel T. Roulet

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleoclimatologyCarbon cycleClimatologyOrbital forcingHoloceneGeologyIce sheetAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental sciencePrecipitationVegetation (pathology)Climate changeOceanographyEcosystemInsolationMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An inverse method is used to investigate the global carbon cycle from the early Holocene (8 kyr BP) to the end of the pre‐industrial period (0 kyr BP) in an improved version of the “green” McGill Paleoclimate Model (MPM). In this paper, we now take into account the vegetation‐precipitation feedback and evaluate the terrestrial carbon cycle for the pre‐industrial equilibrium. From our coupled transient simulation under orbital forcing, reconstructed (Taylor Dome) atmospheric CO 2 forcing and a prescribed retreating Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS), we find a decrease of 70 PgC in total carbon storage in the Sahara region (15°N to 30°N and 15°W to 50°E), which is caused by the desertification simulated in the green MPM. The above decrease is partially compensated by an increase of 40 PgC in total carbon storage in the Southern Hemisphere from 8 to 2 kyr BP. From an analysis of the total carbon stored under the ice sheet, we can infer that this carbon has negligible impact on atmospheric CO 2 after 8 kyr BP. From our model results, we further conclude that the retreating LIS, together with the vegetation‐albedo feedback, cause the global terrestrial carbon to increase from 8 to 6 kyr BP. The application of the inverse method suggests that the first 10 ppmv increase in atmospheric CO 2 from 8 to 6 kyr BP comes from the ocean. Finally, in the model simulations, the total terrestrial carbon release from 6 to 0 kyr BP is about 68 to 95 PgC, which would produce about a 5 to 7 ppmv atmospheric CO 2 increase, based on the calculation of Joos et al. (2004). Owing to our model limitation (there is no ocean carbon cycle), we cannot conclude whether the overall oceanic CO 2 release from 8 to 0 kyr BP is due to outgassing related to SST changes or to calcite compensation as proposed by Broecker et al. (2001).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Biogeochemical CyclesSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207