Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsAdvanced Scientific Computing ResearchInter-University Accelerator CentreInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstitute for Chemical Research, Kyoto UniversityUniversity of RochesterRussian Academy of SciencesHarish-Chandra Research InstituteChinese Academy of SciencesUniversidad de SalamancaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareIndian Institute of Technology IndoreUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniverza v MariboruUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMHenan Normal UniversityTartu ÜlikoolUniversity of TorontoHelmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und EnergieUniversidad Autónoma de MadridBergische Universität WuppertalUniversità di PisaUniversity of MissouriDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of DelhiUniversity of ReginaUniversity of TsukubaUniwersytet WarszawskiUniversity of GlasgowDevi Ahilya VishwavidyalayaUniwersytet Śląski w KatowicachHokkaido UniversityUniversity of CyprusUniversity of TokushimaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónHigh Energy Accelerator Research OrganizationDivision of Mathematical SciencesKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyWaseda UniversityVrije Universiteit BrusselCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMax-Planck-GesellschaftKorea Science and Engineering FoundationUniversity of California, IrvineIsrael Science FoundationGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaUniversity of BristolUniverza v LjubljaniNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversità degli Studi di TriesteUniversity of OregonBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungInstitute of High Energy PhysicsMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyVietnam Academy of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Notre DameScottish Universities Physics AllianceIndian Institute of Science Education and Research MohaliUniversità degli Studi di PaviaGangneung-Wonju National UniversityPolitechnika WarszawskaInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsUniversity of OklahomaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungUniversity of Southern CaliforniaYonsei UniversityUniversität HamburgVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUniversity of South CarolinaBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungIndian Institute of ScienceIowa State UniversityUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WashingtonUniversità degli Studi di MilanoUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of MinnesotaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversiti MalayaWeizmann Institute of ScienceUniversity of OxfordFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSUniversity of DundeeUniversity of SouthamptonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulWayne State UniversityImperial College LondonNational Science FoundationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyYale UniversityJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceUniversitetet i BergenHelsingin YliopistoUniwersytet ŁódzkiHanyang UniversityInstituto de Física de CantabriaVirginia Commonwealth University
KeywordsInternational Linear ColliderColliderHiggs bosonPhysicsLuminosityLinear particle acceleratorNuclear physicsParticle physicsDetectorFactory (object-oriented programming)Beam (structure)Computer scienceOpticsAstronomy
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThe International Linear Collider Technical Design Report (TDR) describes in four volumes the physics case and the design of a 500 GeV centre-of-mass energy linear electron-positron collider based on superconducting radio-frequency technology using Niobium cavities as the accelerating structures. The accelerator can be extended to 1 TeV and also run as a Higgs factory at around 250 GeV and on the Z0 pole. A comprehensive value estimate of the accelerator is give, together with associated uncertainties. It is shown that no significant technical issues remain to be solved. Once a site is selected and the necessary site-dependent engineering is carried out, construction can begin immediately. The TDR also gives baseline documentation for two high-performance detectors that can share the ILC luminosity by being moved into and out of the beam line in a "push-pull" configuration. These detectors, ILD and SiD, are described in detail. They form the basis for a world-class experimental programme that promises to increase significantly our understanding of the fundamental processes that govern the evolution of the Universe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.794
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
