MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cultivation of Students’ Self-Study Ability in Computer and Classroom Teaching Mode

2010· article· en· W1795252077 on OpenAlex
Chun-mei Ren, Jian Zhou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesConstructivism (international relations)PsychologyPedagogyMathematics educationPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the innovation of college English teaching, the cultivation of students’ self-study ability has become a target of the New Requirements for College English Teaching. As one of the country’s 180 experimental academies chosen by National Education Commission, our college adopts the teaching mode of combing classroom teaching and computer-based self-study system. Through the practice of students of grades 2004 and 2005, we can see that the comprehensive application ability of the students does not improve largely. Most students do not satisfy the oral English requirements of common standard. Their self-study ability is insufficient. In this paper, my opinion on how to cultivate students’ English self-study ability in the computer and classroom teaching mode will be given. Key words: computer and classroom teaching mode, self-study, metacognition, constructivism Resume: Depuis la reforme de l’enseignement de l’anglais universitaire, la formation de la capacite d’apprendre par soi-meme est deja devenue un des objectifs du Programme. En tant qu’une des 180 ecoles-pilotes elus par la Commission d’Etat de l’Education, notre ecole adopte le modele d’enseignement combinant l’enseignement en classe et le systeme d’auto-apprentissage assite par l’ordinateur. La realite des deux promotions 2004 et 2005 montre que l’elevation de la capacite d’application generale des eleves n’est pas sensible et que le niveau oral de la plupart des eleves ne repond pas a la demande generale. Les eleves sont peu aptes a apprendre par eux-memes. Dans l’article present, l’auteur va presenter ses points de vue personnels sur la formation de la capacite d’auto-apprentissage de l’anglais des eleves, avec l’aide de l’ordinateur et le modele d’enseignement en classe. Mots-cles: sur la base de l’ordinateur et l’enseignement en classe, auto-apprentissage, theorie de metacognition, theorie d’apprentissage constructiviste 摘 要:大學英語教學改革以來,自主學習能力的培養已成為《課程要求》的目標之一。我校作為全國 180 所國家教委選定的試點院校之一,教學過程中採用了課堂教學和基於電腦自主學習系統相結合的教學模式; 通過 2004級和 2005級兩屆學生的實踐教學來看,學生的綜合應用能力提高的幅度不大,多數學生口語表達 能力還沒有達到一般要求。自主學習能力較差。本文基於電腦和課堂教學,對如何培養學生的英語自主學習 能力談一下自己粗淺的看法。 關鍵詞: 基於電腦和課堂教學;自主學習;元認知理論;建構主義學習理論

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it