Longitudinal anatomical and metabolic MRI characterization of orthotopic xenograft prostate tumors in nude mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess anatomic and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for monitoring of tumor volume and metabolism of orthotopic xenograft prostate cancer tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human-derived PC-3M cells were implanted into the prostate in 22 nude mice. Tumor volume and MRI appearance were monitored for up to 29 days. Histology was performed to detect metastases. Hyperpolarized [1-(13) C]pyruvate MRI was used to measure tumor metabolism on day 22. RESULTS: Tumors were visible by MRI 9 days after tumor cell implantation. Tumor volume increased to 720 ± 190 mm(3) on day 29 of imaging. Metastasis was seen in the iliac lymph nodes at all timepoints, and in more distant lymph nodes at later timepoints, but was not detectable by MRI. Regions with low pyruvate uptake corresponded to regions with necrosis and had a higher lactate/pyruvate ratio (0.98 ± 0.4 vs. 1.6 ± 1.1). CONCLUSION: MRI using the balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence can be used to monitor tumor growth in orthotopic PC-3M tumors as early as 9 days post-injection. Hyperpolarized pyruvate MRI has potential to assess tumor metabolism and necrosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".